~duerer

Aloha!!!

So, the new Hulk film came out in Germany this week and I saw it yesterday. And they wasted so much potential.

So what are you guys thinking?
Would you say that Ang Lee's Hulk from 2003 was better or the new one with E. Norton?

For me it's easy, I really love Ang Lee's version it's just a great fun flick.
The cast was better, the atmosphere was better, some stuff was a little cheesy and b-moviesk, but it was always fun to watch, even when there was no action.

The new one left me cold. E. Norton was lame, he never grabbed me once, when he was turning into the Hulk he looked like doing some hard work on a toilette.
Banner had absolutely no depth and the thing with this pulse-alarm-watch-thing was just stupid, that was more like power rangers.
Liv Taylor was just flat.
The best things where some nice fighting scenes and the new look of the Hulk, but that's really all.

HULK (2003) would smash Hulk (2008) into a puddle of green mess.