HULK (2003) vs. Hulk (2008)
Journal Entry: Sat Jul 12, 2008, 9:43 AM
- Mood:
Joy - Listening to: SAGE FRANCIS
- Reading: comics and stuff for my studies
- Watching: a documentary about the orient
Aloha!!!
So, the new Hulk film came out in Germany this week and I saw it yesterday. And they wasted so much potential.
So what are you guys thinking?
Would you say that Ang Lee's Hulk from 2003 was better or the new one with E. Norton?
For me it's easy, I really love Ang Lee's version it's just a great fun flick.
The cast was better, the atmosphere was better, some stuff was a little cheesy and b-moviesk, but it was always fun to watch, even when there was no action.
The new one left me cold. E. Norton was lame, he never grabbed me once, when he was turning into the Hulk he looked like doing some hard work on a toilette.
Banner had absolutely no depth and the thing with this pulse-alarm-watch-thing was just stupid, that was more like power rangers.
Liv Taylor was just flat.
The best things where some nice fighting scenes and the new look of the Hulk, but that's really all.
HULK (2003) would smash Hulk (2008) into a puddle of green mess.
Devious Comments
--
My lifestyle determines my deathstyle...
----
my gallery | my site
--
Jesse Munoz
jessemunoz[dot]com
[link]
--
Curious about who this Tanake Trang is?
--
"Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines."
CB
--
So much good art................so little time
Enjoy the sage.
what album u like?
DKY
--
Wardell Brown
[link]
--
Martin Santos
--
Here i am on deviant
and here is my homepage: [link]
--
'As God is my witness, I'm a born and raised atheist.'
--
Life is a sketchbook...draw your own conclusions.
-VHD2
CB
--
So much good art................so little time
--
If you believe in prayer,
pray that people will find...
the strength to change
line from the movie "an inconvenient truth".
Previous Page12345... Next Page